New Feature
Posted: 12/21/2011
Anyone knows if there any plans at FPL to introduce a “Call Blocking” feature? Certainly something we could use.
Pierre
Pierre
Fongo powers free calling solutions for a number of brands. This forum includes information and tips on all of those offerings. Note that your specific services may vary based on the specific Fongo product that you're using.
https://forum.fongo.com/
... or of course calling into a number that captures your "outgoing" caller-ID (such as WATS/8yy numbers, standard CID devices, etc)...fpl-mike wrote:HI Pierre and Hardy,
At this point in time we are not able to block any numbers as we do not release any of our numbers to third party company's. The only way for a person/organization or company to get your number is if you have used it on another web site, signed up for a service (from a company that may release it). I know that it is a feature that will be taken into consideration as we continue to grow.
TheHardy wrote:... or of course calling into a number that captures your "outgoing" caller-ID (such as WATS/8yy numbers, standard CID devices, etc)...fpl-mike wrote:HI Pierre and Hardy,
At this point in time we are not able to block any numbers as we do not release any of our numbers to third party company's. The only way for a person/organization or company to get your number is if you have used it on another web site, signed up for a service (from a company that may release it). I know that it is a feature that will be taken into consideration as we continue to grow.
I think that is more what Pierre was questioning ... supporting something along the lines of *67 per call CID blocking ...
(correct me if I am wrong)
It is a bit of an older suggestion, and has been well hashed already. I believe that Steve and Kris have weighed in on it at times, and have "yellow-lighted" the idea for various reasons; I am unsure if the idea would gain much traction, but I certainly would not be opposed to it ... just not holding my breath on it.fpl-mike wrote:Something along the lines of *67 is would not be a bad idea. I will certainly bring that up to the right people.