FONGO_mike wrote:Just a heads up, i have passed this information along to the decision makers to see if they can do anything with this.
TheHardy wrote:If we are going to advocate for this, then we should push hard for it to be entirely free, as even at .01 or .02 per minute, you have to add the 4c connection fee, which makes the first minute .05-.06 ...
FONGO_mike wrote:Just a heads up, i have passed this information along to the decision makers to see if they can do anything with this.
VoipDiy wrote:FONGO_mike wrote:Just a heads up, i have passed this information along to the decision makers to see if they can do anything with this.
Thanks very much for doing that, Fongo_mike!
FONGO_mike wrote:
We always pass along good ideas
seagame2001 wrote:I think at this time FPL or Fongo just need to expand more free calling cities in their list
TheHardy wrote: Whether or not people know about iNUM is not the issue ... and to that end, if more providers start supporting iNUM, then there is a higher likelihood that word will spread and that more and more people will become familiar with itseagame2001 wrote:I think at this time FPL or Fongo just need to expand more free calling cities in their list
I too hope for both an expanded free calling area (perhaps even Canada-wide?) as well as an increased DID/POP footprint. That said, supporting iNUM is a ZERO cost operation for Fongo and would garner them some more publicity. Adding support for iNUM requires no capital output and minimal infrastructure changes/programming etc on the network side of things.
seagame2001 wrote:Over almost 3800 members of this forum but not even 10 people vote what's wrong. Need to put this topic on the headline of the forum.
Your vote will count and thanks from VoiPDYI to bring this topic up to FPL
cvijax wrote:Why only iNum 883+ numbers. It will be useful to be able to do e164 lookups too. No? But yes I agree being able to call iNums for free or some nominal price will be appreciated feature. For now we have to live with PSTN bridges.
seagame2001 wrote:Over almost 3800 members of this forum but not even 10 people vote what's wrong. Need to put this topic on the headline of the forum.
Your vote will count and thanks from VoiPDYI to bring this topic up to FPL
FONGO_mike wrote:Of the 3800 members, many posted once or not at all. Although there are indeed 3800 registered members, a very small percentage are active regular users.
Return to Suggestions & Feedback
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests