Bearer capability not authorized
-
- Tried and True
- Posts: 330
- Joined: 09/21/2010
- SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
- Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
- ISP Name: Rogers
- Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
- Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
- Location: Ottawa
Bearer capability not authorized
Well, this may explain why I miss some calls. My Call Logs intermitantly have this show up in the Disconnect Reason, "Bearer capability not authorized'. Anyone?
-
- Tried and True
- Posts: 330
- Joined: 09/21/2010
- SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
- Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
- ISP Name: Rogers
- Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
- Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
- Location: Ottawa
Re: Bearer capability not authorized
Bearer Capability Not Authorized.
Indicates that the user has requested a bearer capability which is implemented by the equipment that generated this cause but the user is not authorized to use.
Indicates that the user has requested a bearer capability which is implemented by the equipment that generated this cause but the user is not authorized to use.
-
- ***Übergod***
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 08/13/2011
- SIP Device Name: FPL PC softphone (buggy)
- Firmware Version: 3.0.3.0
- ISP Name: Telus Optik
- Computer OS: Win7
- Router: Actiontec V1000H
- Smartphone Model: none
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Bearer capability not authorized
Ummmmm, I am beyond my knowledge base on this one ... Steve? Mike? Jake?
Hardy - Surrey, BC ~~ increasingly disgruntled FPL user ... comon, fix your stuff!
driver/webmaster - INCARTA Professional Delivery & Moving -- http://www.incarta.ca 604-594-7126
driver/webmaster - INCARTA Professional Delivery & Moving -- http://www.incarta.ca 604-594-7126
-
- Lightly Seasoned
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 04/06/2010
- SIP Device Name: Double-NAT PAP2T-NA
- Firmware Version: 5.1.6 (LS)
- ISP Name: Rogers Express with SB5101
- Computer OS: Win7 32-bit for DV softphone
- Router: WNR3500L behind DIR-615C1
- Location: Brampton, ON
Re: Bearer capability not authorized
I was using PIAF Purple for more than a year until my old Pentium 4 pbx server crapped out 5 months ago. I never had the problem that you have. If you have not done already, you should post your observation in the PIAF forum. I am sure forum members there can help you. Most members here are happy just to have a working VOIP phone...I am! 

.
You agree to read my posts at your own risk.
You agree to read my posts at your own risk.
-
- Tried and True
- Posts: 330
- Joined: 09/21/2010
- SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
- Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
- ISP Name: Rogers
- Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
- Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
- Location: Ottawa
Re: Bearer capability not authorized
This is new, and was only seen when they were having problems last weekend/earlier this week. It hasn't been seen since then. I'm thinking it has been taken care of, but will keep an eye on my Call Logs (FPL call logs, not PIAF) to make sure it doesn't repeat.cu2o2o2 wrote:I was using PIAF Purple for more than a year until my old Pentium 4 pbx server crapped out 5 months ago. I never had the problem that you have. If you have not done already, you should post your observation in the PIAF forum. I am sure forum members there can help you. Most members here are happy just to have a working VOIP phone...I am!