Bearer capability not authorized

This section is for general discussions surrounding digital phone service.
tbrummell
Tried and True
Posts: 330
Joined: 09/21/2010
SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
ISP Name: Rogers
Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
Location: Ottawa

Bearer capability not authorized

Post by tbrummell »

Well, this may explain why I miss some calls. My Call Logs intermitantly have this show up in the Disconnect Reason, "Bearer capability not authorized'. Anyone?
tbrummell
Tried and True
Posts: 330
Joined: 09/21/2010
SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
ISP Name: Rogers
Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
Location: Ottawa

Re: Bearer capability not authorized

Post by tbrummell »

Bearer Capability Not Authorized.

Indicates that the user has requested a bearer capability which is implemented by the equipment that generated this cause but the user is not authorized to use.
User avatar
TheHardy
***Übergod***
Posts: 1632
Joined: 08/13/2011
SIP Device Name: FPL PC softphone (buggy)
Firmware Version: 3.0.3.0
ISP Name: Telus Optik
Computer OS: Win7
Router: Actiontec V1000H
Smartphone Model: none
Location: Surrey, BC

Re: Bearer capability not authorized

Post by TheHardy »

Ummmmm, I am beyond my knowledge base on this one ... Steve? Mike? Jake?
Hardy - Surrey, BC ~~ increasingly disgruntled FPL user ... comon, fix your stuff!
driver/webmaster - INCARTA Professional Delivery & Moving -- http://www.incarta.ca 604-594-7126
cu2o2o2
Lightly Seasoned
Posts: 227
Joined: 04/06/2010
SIP Device Name: Double-NAT PAP2T-NA
Firmware Version: 5.1.6 (LS)
ISP Name: Rogers Express with SB5101
Computer OS: Win7 32-bit for DV softphone
Router: WNR3500L behind DIR-615C1
Location: Brampton, ON

Re: Bearer capability not authorized

Post by cu2o2o2 »

I was using PIAF Purple for more than a year until my old Pentium 4 pbx server crapped out 5 months ago. I never had the problem that you have. If you have not done already, you should post your observation in the PIAF forum. I am sure forum members there can help you. Most members here are happy just to have a working VOIP phone...I am! 8-)
.

You agree to read my posts at your own risk.
tbrummell
Tried and True
Posts: 330
Joined: 09/21/2010
SIP Device Name: PIAF/Mitel/PolyCom/Cisco
Firmware Version: Asterisk 1.8
ISP Name: Rogers
Computer OS: CentOS/Windows2008/Win7/Android
Router: pfSense/Neoware thin client
Location: Ottawa

Re: Bearer capability not authorized

Post by tbrummell »

cu2o2o2 wrote:I was using PIAF Purple for more than a year until my old Pentium 4 pbx server crapped out 5 months ago. I never had the problem that you have. If you have not done already, you should post your observation in the PIAF forum. I am sure forum members there can help you. Most members here are happy just to have a working VOIP phone...I am! 8-)
This is new, and was only seen when they were having problems last weekend/earlier this week. It hasn't been seen since then. I'm thinking it has been taken care of, but will keep an eye on my Call Logs (FPL call logs, not PIAF) to make sure it doesn't repeat.